Seamless titanium tubes in multiple diameters on a clean inspection bench

Titanium technical resource | standards & applications

Titanium Grade 4 Pipe Tube: The Latest Advancements in High-Performance Piping

Titanium Grade 4 pipe and tube use the highest-strength of the common commercially pure titanium grades.

  • Standards-aware sourcing guidance
  • Grade and application comparisons
  • Inspection and RFQ considerations

Titanium Grade 4 Pipe Tube: The Latest Advancements in High-Performance Piping

2024-08-30

Titanium Grade 4 pipe and tube use the highest-strength of the common commercially pure titanium grades, achieved partly through a higher permitted oxygen level than Grades 1–3. It should not be described as a low-oxygen grade. Selection requires balancing strength and formability with corrosion environment, fabrication and the applicable pipe or tube specification.

Where Grade 4 Fits Among CP Titanium

CharacteristicGrade 4 implication
Material identityCommercially pure titanium, UNS R50700
StrengthHigher minimum strength than common CP Grades 1–3 under the relevant product standard
FormabilityGenerally lower ductility than lower-strength CP grades; forming route must be reviewed
CorrosionProtective oxide film provides resistance in many services, but suitability depends on chemistry, temperature and crevice conditions

Pipe and Tube Are Not Interchangeable Terms

Pipe is commonly ordered by nominal pipe size and schedule, while heat-exchanger or condenser tube is typically defined by outside diameter and wall thickness. ASTM B338 is widely associated with titanium seamless and welded tube for condenser and heat-exchanger service. Other pipe or tube specifications may apply according to form and application. The purchase order must name the exact standard and edition.

RFQ Information

  • Grade 4 / UNS R50700 and the governing specification
  • Seamless or welded construction
  • NPS and schedule, or OD and wall thickness
  • Length, tolerance, end finish and surface condition
  • Hydrostatic, pneumatic, eddy-current or other required tests
  • Quantity, MTR and additional inspection documentation

A melting point or generic corrosion claim does not establish pressure-system suitability. Design pressure, temperature, weld quality, allowable stress and code compliance must be evaluated for the completed system.


WhatsApp